Mandatory Reporting and Intimate Partner Violence
Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) can interact with mandatory reporting in a variety of ways:
The requirements for mandatory reporting and IPV are often confusing and change state to state:
Most states’ mandatory reporting laws require health care providers to report IPV-related injuries; only four of those states allow survivors to refuse the report (Durborow, Lizdas, O’Flaherty, & Marjavi, 2013).
Some states list domestic violence advocates as mandatory reporters (Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2016a).
Survivors who are abused with the use of weapons and seek medical help may have their injuries reported based on mandatory reporting laws for crime-related injuries (Jordan & Pritchard, 2018).
In the aforementioned 18 states and Puerto Rico, mandatory reporting laws survivors’ informal networks (i.e., friends, family, acquaintances) into mandated reporters.
Most U.S. states have expansive mandatory reporting laws related to child abuse or neglect that include child exposure to domestic violence as a form of harm to children (Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2016b).
These requirements can harm survivors; they are based on misunderstanding around domestic violence and can be used to imply that the violence and harm done by abusers is the survivor’s fault.
“He is more abusive but he just makes sure no one is listening to us, so they will not go and report us again.”-
Participant, There’s no one I can trust (Lippy et al., 2019)